72 A.D.2d 439, *; 424 N.Y.S.2d 535, **;

1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9699, ***

 

 

Liang Ren-Guey, Respondent-Appellant, v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc. Appellant-Respondent

 

[NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL]

 

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

 

72 A.D.2d 439; 424 N.Y.S.2d 535; 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9699

 

 

February 11, 1980

 

PRIOR HISTORY:   [***1]

 

Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Norman L. Harvey, J.), entered February ll, 1980 in Essex County, which granted, in part, plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent that defendant was enjoined from preventing plaintiff from participating in the 1980 Lake Placid Winter Olympic Games with the same privileges as are extended to all athletes from all nations, and directed that the national flag to be borne by or on behalf of plaintiff shall be the official flag of the Republic of China, that if the occasion should arise, plaintiff shall be entitled to have the official national anthem of the Republic of China played, that plaintiff shall be permitted to wear the uniform or distinctive clothing similar to or the same as that worn by prior participants from the Republic of China and that plaintiff have residential privileges in the Olympic Village at Lake Placid. Liang Ren-Guey v Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, 72 AD2d  .

 

DISPOSITION: Motion of the United States Attorney General granted, without costs.

 

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied and complaint dismissed.

 

 

CASE SUMMARY

 

PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff athlete and defendant corporation filed cross-appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (New York), which granted in part, the athlete's motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent that the corporation was enjoined from preventing plaintiff from participating in the Olympic Games with the same privileges as were extended to all athletes from all nations. 

 

OVERVIEW: The corporation was a not-for-profit corporation established under New York law to comply with the requirement of the Olympic Charter that the National Olympic Committee (NOC) of the host country establish an appropriate entity to serve as a surrogate of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to operate the games. The athlete was selected by the Taiwanese NOC to participate in the Olympic Games, and he sought a permanent injunction staying the games unless the corporation allowed him to use the flag, emblem, name, and anthem of the Republic of China. In reversing the trial court's order, the court held that the President had the sole power to recognize foreign governments, and recognition of a foreign government was a political question that a court could not entertain. By a resolution, the IOC gave only conditional recognition to Taiwan and expressly rejected Taiwan's traditional anthem and flag. Since the Department of State, acting on the President's behalf, elected to defer to the IOC in matters concerning national representation at the Olympics, the issue was a political question, and beyond the powers of the court to review. 

 

OUTCOME: The court reversed the trial court's judgment and dismissed the complaint. 

 

CORE TERMS: flag, games, anthem, emblem, athlete, political question, sovereignty, diplomatic recognition, permanent injunction, executive board, charter, not-for-profit, notification, surrogate, withdrawn, elected, staying, compete, defer

 

LexisNexis(R) Headnotes  Hide Headnotes

 

 

Civil Procedure > Justiciability > Political Questions

 

 

Constitutional Law > The Presidency

 

 

Constitutional Law > The Judiciary > Case or Controversy > Political Questions

 

HN1 The President has the sole power to recognize foreign governments. Whether a foreign government should be recognized is a political question that neither the United States Supreme Court nor any other American court may review.  More Like This Headnote | Shepardize: Restrict By Headnote 

 

 

 Hide Headnotes / Syllabus

 

HEADNOTES:

Courts -- Political Questions Doctrine

 

In an [***2]  action by a Taiwanese athlete selected to participate in the 1980 Lake Placid Winter Olympic Games for a permanent injunction staying the Games unless defendant, a not-for-profit corporation established to operate the Games, allowed plaintiff to use the flag, emblem, name and anthem of the Republic of China, the complaint is dismissed; the International Olympic Committee (IOC), after receiving notification that the United States had withdrawn diplomatic recognition of Taiwan, had adopted a resolution allowing the National Olympic Committee (NOC) of the People's Republic of China to use the nation's official flag, anthem and emblem, while changing the name of the Taiwanese NOC and requiring submission of alternatives for the flag, anthem and emblem to be used by the Taiwanese at the Games, and since the Department of State, acting on behalf of the President, who has the sole power to recognize foreign governments, elected to defer to the IOC in matters concerning national representation at the Olympics, the issue is a political question and is, therefore, beyond the powers of a court to review.

 

COUNSEL: William Kissel (Rogers & Wells [William S. Greenwalt of counsel]), for appellant-respondent.  [***3]

 

Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan (Bernard H. Goldstein of counsel), for respondent-appellant.

 

George H. Lowe, United States Attorney (Mark C. Rutzick of counsel), for the Attorney General of the United States.

 

JUDGES: Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Casey, JJ., concur.

 

OPINIONBY: PER CURIAM

 

OPINION:  [*440]  OPINION OF THE COURT

 

 [**536]  The International Olympic Committee (IOC) governs the Olympic Games and owns the rights to them. The Olympic Charter provides that every person or organization that participates in the games shall accept the supreme authority of the IOC. The charter gives the IOC complete control over the development and conduct of the games and makes the IOC the final authority on all questions concerning the games. The various National Olympic Committees (NOC) are the IOC representatives in their respective countries. The NOC from a given country is not free to define itself. The charter provides that the name of an NOC must reflect the territorial extent and tradition of its country subject to IOC approval. Competing athletes, such as plaintiff, must be affiliated with the NOC of their nation.

 

The problem of having two Chinas [***4]  competing in the Olympics has confronted the IOC since 1960, when the IOC required athletes from the Republic of China (Taiwan) to compete under the name "Formosa". * At an IOC session in April of 1979, the IOC resolved to allow both Chinas to compete in the 1980 games. However, the resolution left to the executive board of the IOC determinations regarding names, flags, anthems and constitutions. After receiving notification that the United States had withdrawn diplomatic recognition of Taiwan, the executive board, at a meeting held October 23 to 25, 1979, adopted a resolution  [**537]  allowing the NOC from the People's Republic of China to use the nation's official flag, anthem and emblem, while changing the name of the Taiwanese NOC and requiring submission of alternatives for the flag, anthem and emblem to be used by the Taiwanese at the games.

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Footnotes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

 

* The Taiwanese did so under protest. In 1976, the Taiwanese were not permitted to use their official name, flag and anthem at the Montreal Summer Olympics.

 

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - [***5]

 

 [*441]  The defendant is a not-for-profit corporation established under New York law to comply with the requirement of the Olympic Charter that the NOC of the host country establish an appropriate entity to serve as a surrogate of the IOC to operate the games. Plaintiff is an athlete selected by the Taiwanese NOC to participate in the winter Olympic Games at Lake Placid. In this action he seeks a permanent injunction staying the games unless defendant allows plaintiff to use the flag, emblem, name and anthem of the Republic of China.

 

Initially, we grant the motion of the United States Attorney General to file a statement of interest of the United States with respect to this matter (US Code, tit 28, § 517).

 

Both the plaintiff and Special Term focus on the narrow issue of plaintiff's rights as an individual. In our view, however, the issue is much broader since plaintiff seeks not only to express his own individual political beliefs, but also to carry a flag and wear an emblem symbolic of the country which he represents as a participant in the games.

 

HN1The President has the sole power to recognize foreign governments ( United States v Pink, 315 U.S. 203, 223; United States  [***6]  v Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, 330). Whether a foreign government should be recognized is a political question that neither the United States Supreme Court nor any other American court may review ( Oetjen v Central Leather Co., 246 U.S. 297, 302, 304; National Union Fire Ins. Co. v Republic of China, 254 F2d 177, 186, cert den 358 U.S. 823).

 

The flag is the emblem of national sovereignty ( Halter v Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34; see, also, Convention on the High Seas of April 29, 1958, 2 UST 2312, art 5; 52 Amer J of Int L 842, 843), and since it is inextricably intertwined with the national identity, use of a flag, in an event such as the Olympic Games, creates an issue of sovereign representation. In effect, plaintiff asks this court to compel the defendant, as surrogate of the IOC, to recognize a symbol of national sovereignty. However, by its resolution, the IOC gave only conditional recognition to Taiwan and expressly rejected Taiwan's traditional anthem and flag. Since the Department of State, acting on behalf of the President, has elected to defer to the IOC in matters concerning national representation at the Olympics, the issue involved in this appeal is a political question,  [***7]  bound up as it is with difficult questions of foreign policy, and is, therefore, beyond the powers of this court to review.

 

 [*442]  The motion of the United States Attorney General should be granted, without costs.

 

The order should be reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion should be denied and the complaint dismissed.

 

Motion of the United States Attorney General granted, without costs.

 

Order reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied and complaint dismissed.