May 9, 2006
TAX ISSUES RELATED TO DIVORCE
Sponsored
By:
The
Bank of New York
Howell Bramson, Esq.
Kathleen Donelli, Esq.
11 Martine
Avenue
White
Plains, New York 10606
(914)
946-3700
e-mail: info@mccarthyfingar.com
Table of Contents
Page
4 I. Ownership of Marital Residence
4 II. Marital Property Divisions - §1041
5 III. Sale or Exchange of Personal Residence
6 IV. Deduction for “qualified residence
interest.”
6 V. Dependency Exemption
6 A. Qualification
of the Child as Dependent
7 B. Who
Can Claim the Dependency Deduction?
8 C. Pre-1985 Separation Agreements
9 D. Phase-Out
Limitations
10 VI. Head of Household Designation
10 VII. Innocent Spouse
10 A. Means
For Obtaining Relief
10 B. Requirements
for Innocent Spouse Relief
11 C. Separation
of Liabilities
11 D. Election
of Separate Liability
11 E. Equitable
Relief
12 F. Proposed
Language for Separation Agreements
12 VIII. Alimony/Maintenance/Spousal Support
12 A. IRC
§§215 and 71
12 B. Alimony
or separate Maintenance payments defined
14 C. Recomputation
where excess front-loading of alimony payments
16 D. Alimony
and separate maintenance payments
20 IX. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
20 A. QDRO
20 B. Types of Plans
21 C. Plan Categories
21 X. Practical Advice
21 A. Deducting legal fees on income tax
returns
21 B. Applying pre-commencement income tax
overpayments to post-commencement income tax payments
21 C. Need
to tax impact capital gains taxes on:
·
Sale of marital residence
·
Transfer of securities
·
Distribution on options that cannot be transferred
·
Transfer of retirement benefits
I. Ownership
of Marital Residence
A. Only owner can deduct taxes and interest
on mortgage payments. Can avoid the
problem by structuring payments as spousal support.
B. Payor of spousal support can deduct as
alimony interest and property taxes paid directly to mortgagee or taxing
authority if payments are required by agreement.
II.
Marital Property Divisions - §1041
A. No gain or loss recognized upon transfer
of property between spouses or former spouses if transfer is incident to a
divorce. (Overrule Davis Case.)
B. Equitable distributions are not taxable.
C. Applies to sales and exchanges,
inter-spousal gifts and in-kind distribution of property.
D. Applies to losses as well as gains. “Passive activity losses” is exception to
carryover basis. If H transfers property
with suspended losses to W, W will not be able to deduct the suspended
losses. Instead, added to basis.
E. Holding period tacks.
F. Requirements
1. Applies to transfer of property between
spouses and between former spouses if the post-divorce transfer is incident to
divorce.
2. “Incident to Divorce” - - safe harbor –
a. Transfer occurs not more than one year
after divorce or
b. Transfer is related to cessation of
marriage if:
(i) Pursuant to divorce or separation
instrument, and
(ii) Transfer occurs not more than six years
after the
divorce
(payments could be later).
If
both of the above are not met, presumption that not
covered
by 1041. Presumption can be rebutted.
3. What if no transfer is made?
See
LTR 9143050 (H was plaintiff in patent infringement suit. Under divorce court’s order, had to pay W 25%
of amount received). Held - - no
transfer. H is taxed on full amount.
G. Carryover Basis - - must consider tax
consequences.
H. Installment Obligations - - can transfer
without acceleration.
I. Sometimes taxable transfer is
desirable.
J. Installment sale between spouses
Interest
is taxable to recipient. Interest may or
may not be deductible by payor.
(i) Deductible if secured by house
(ii) Deductible if business and investment interest
(iii) No imputed interest in 1041 transaction
(see Treas. Reg § 1.1274-1(b)(3)(iii))
K. Business Interests
Consider
use of preferred stock (if C corp., partnership, or LLC)
III. Sale or Exchange of
Personal Residence
A. Gain on sale of principal residence is
excluded up to $250,000 (or
$500,000). See Section 121.
B. Requirements for Exclusion
1. Owned and used as principal
residence for periods aggregating two years or more in the five-year period
ending on date of sale.
2. Once every two years.
3. If married couples file a joint return
in year of sale, either spouse’s ownership and use qualifies.
4. Special rules for separated and
divorced taxpayers (71(d)(3))
a. If selling T/P previously obtained the
home from spouse or former spouse in 1041 transaction, the T/P’s holding period includes that of spouse or
former spouse.
b. If spouse or former is granted use of
home under a divorce instrument, that occupant’s use of property as his or her
residence during that period is imputed to other spouse.
5. Amount of Exclusion - $500,000 if (a)
joint return in year of sale; (b) either spouse meets ownership requirements; (c)
both meet use requirement; and (d) neither has used exemption in last 2 years.
IV. Deduction for “qualified
residence interest.”
A. What is the meaning of “one other
residence of the taxpayer?”
1. Probably requires the residence to be
owned, in whole or in part, by T/P. If
ownership transferred to ex-spouse, T/P can’t deduct interest (unless qualifies
as alimony).
2. Only needs to own portion. Thus, portion T/P pays which does not qualify
as alimony can be deducted as qualified residence interest.
B. Use as residence - - Does it qualify as
“second residence” if non-occupant spouse?
As long as someone uses it as “residence,” probably qualifies, but not
clear.
C. If taxpayer owns portion of property and
ex-spouse occupant owns part, payments of his own share of housing expenses
cannot qualify as alimony (not payments “on behalf of” payee).
V. Dependency Exemption
A. Qualification
of the Child as Dependent
For a child to qualify as a dependent for the dependency deduction,
both parents together must provide more than one-half of the child's support
during the year and the child is either:
1. Less
than 19 years old;
2. Less
than 24 years old and a full-time student;
3. The child is 19 years
old or older and is not a student but has income during the year of less than
the exemption amount.
Dependent must have a Social
Security number, unless born in December.
Omission of dependent's Social Security Number will result in processing delay
and possible $50 penalty. [IRC § 152]
IRC § 152 delineates a list of
persons who may be considered "dependents". The taxpayer seeking to claim such individual
as a "dependent" must have provided over half of that person's
support for the calendar year. Besides children, parents, siblings,
stepchildren, stepparents and in-laws are among the delineated individuals.
B. Who Can
Claim the Dependency Deduction?
1. Generally,
the parent who has custody of a child may claim the dependency deduction,
unless otherwise released to the non-custodial parent, or the court otherwise
determines. Custody is determined by the divorce decree or separation agreement.
If the agreement is silent, custody is determined by which parent has physical
custody during the greater portion of the calendar year.
2. There are certain situations in which a
non-custodial parent may claim the dependency exemption:
a. A separation agreement
is in effect that designates the non-custodial parent as the person entitled to
claim the exemption. [Multiple parties provide support, but none provides over
one-half (1/2) of the dependent's support. Taxpayer contributed over 10% of support and
other supporters are not claiming dependent.]
b. The custodial parent
relinquishes his right to claim the exemption to the non-custodial parent. This
is done by completing IRS Form 8332.
c. Court awards exemption [Sheehan
v. Sheehan, 152 A.D.2d 942, 543 N.Y.S.2d 827 (A.D. ___ Dep’t 1989)]. Multiple
rulings around the country have upheld trial court wards splitting dependents
(multiple children) between the parents.
Eickelberger v. Eickelberger, 93 Ohio App.3d
221 (Ohio App. 12 Dist. 1994); Pineiro v. Pineiro, 683 So.2d 148 (Fla.3d
DCA 1996)] Get the court to order the releasing party to sign Form 8332;
include release as part of separation agreement and divorce judgment along with
language that the releasing party will not claim the dependent.
Notice, that the
custodial parent has the control over the assignment of this exemption.
3. a. Pursuant to the authority accorded by
IRC Section 152 (3) (2), successful
completion and attachment of IRS Form 8332 enables the
non-custodial parent to claim the dependency
exemption. Satisfying the signature requirement
is critical for this to occur.
b. Along
with the signature of the custodial parent confirming his or her consent, Form
8332 requires the taxpayer to furnish:
(i) The names of the
children for whom exemption claims were released;
(ii) The years for which the
claims were released;
(iii) The Social Security
number of the custodial parent;
(iv) The date of the
custodial parent's signature; and
(v) The name and the Social
Security number of the parent claiming the exemption.
Under Form 8332, the assignment of
the dependency exemption can be released for the current tax year, or the
assignor can release the claim to the dependency exemption for all future years
or for a specified number of years. A
signed form 8332 or its equivalent must be attached for each year the non-custodial
parent is taking the exemption.
[NB. - If the assignor is the
recipient of child support, a provision could
be included in the separation agreement that the assignment of the dependency
deduction(s) would only be effectuated if the payor/assignee is not in default
with his/her child support payments. Thus, Form 8332 should be
signed and delivered on an annual basis if such motive is sought.]
4. In order for assignment of the
dependency exemption to be available, the assignor, spouse or former spouse
[assuming both are the parents of the child] must (a) be divorced or legally
separated; (b) have lived separate and apart at all times during the last six
months of the calendar year; and (c) have a child that is in the custody of one
or both of the parties (as parents) for more than half of the calendar year.
5. Paternity Actions. IRC § 152(e) refers
to children of divorced or legally separated parents. The Code refers to child
of "divorced" parents when addressing the support test. Cases around
the country have followed the application of the dependency deduction to
non-married persons. In Radim v. Commissioner, TC Memo 1987-348,
the holding imposes the burden of proving payment of over one-half of the
dependent's support and disallows reliance upon a waiver from the other parent
which is applicable only for separated or divorce parents.
6. The release by the custodial parent may
be revoked. However, such revocation is only considered by IRS if the
non-custodial parent refrains from claiming the child as a dependent. Thus,
this is reason for annual signing of Form 8332 rather than open-ended
assignment.
C. Pre-1985 Separation
Agreements
For those who have been divorced
under an agreement executed prior to
1985 in which it provides that the non-custodial parent is entitled to the
dependency exemption, the non-custodial parent must provide at least $600 of
child support to the child. In looking at whether or not this test is met, the
child support owed for an earlier year, if paid, is considered support for the
year paid, up to the amount of the required child support for that year.
D. Phase-Out
Limitations
The IRC sets forth limitations as to
the availability of the dependency deduction
for higher income taxpayers. Do not argue over a dependency deduction where
there may be no benefit to your client.
1. The deduction for
personal exemptions is phased-out ratably for taxpayers
once their income gets to a certain level. For the year 2006, these
thresholds are as follows:
The exemption is phased-out once the
threshold AGI is reached. These phase-out thresholds are adjusted annually.
2. These thresholds are to be adjusted
annually for inflation. For tax years beginning in 2006 and 2007, the personal exemption phase-out amount is itself reduced
by the applicable percentage. Specifically, in 2006 and 2007, the personal exemption
reduction amount equals two-thirds of the otherwise applicable reduction
amount. See
Section 151(d)(3)(E) of the Code.
3. Negotiation
of dependency deduction
a. Because of the phase-out
tied to levels of income, in negotiating
who will get the exemption(s), one should keep in mind the parties levels. This
approach should maximize the tax benefit of the dependency
exemptions. If
the parties can agree and settle on allocating exemption back and forth every other year, why not expand the language in the
agreement to include the following:
b. Possible
language: If it is determined that the spouse who is allocated the dependency
exemptions cannot obtain any tax benefit from them for a particular year, due
to their level of income or any other reason, that spouse will agree to sign
Federal Form 8332 allowing the other spouse to take the various dependency
exemptions. Any tax savings generated to the other spouse who has now taken the
dependency exemptions shall share the tax benefits received equally with the
other spouse.
VI. Head of Household Designation
Under IRC §2(b)(1), “head of
household” can only be claimed by the parent with whom the child primarily
resides. Therefore, a parent having
“joint legal custody” could not claim “head of household” status if the
children reside with the other parent.
However, if the parents have “shared physical custody,” there does not
seem to be a prohibition against designating one child’s residential address
with one parent and the second child’s residential address with the other
parent.
VII. Innocent Spouse
A. When one files a joint income tax
return, both taxpayers are jointly and individually liable for the entire tax.
However, if one spouse qualifies as an "innocent spouse", he/she will
be relieved of the tax, penalty and interest. A spouse can get innocent spouse
relief through the following means:
1. Innocent
Spouse relief
2. Separation
of Liability
3. Equitable
relief
B. Requirements for Innocent Spouse Relief
Qualified
as an innocent spouse -- to meet this test, one will need to meet the following
requirements:
1. A joint return had been
filed for the taxable year.
2. The joint return
contains understatement of tax attributable to a grossly erroneous item of the
other spouse.
3.
The
other spouse did not know and had no reason to know there was such an
understatement of tax at the time the return was signed.
4. It would be inequitable
to hold the innocent spouse liable for the deficiency attributable to the
understatement, taking into account all facts and circumstances. (In this
situation, the IRS will consider whether the spouse requesting innocent spouse
relief received any substantial benefits from the other spouse's tax
deficiency.)
C. Separation of Liabilities
The spouse, who had previously filed
a joint return, may elect to have
the liability limited to the portion of the deficiency that is attributable to
him/her. The burden is on the taxpayer electing the relief to prove that the
allocation is proper (one way is to look at what would have been allocated to
the individual if the spouse had filed a separate return for the year in
question). The limitation of liability is to the extent that items giving rise
to the deficiency are allocable to that spouse. To qualify for this exemption,
the spouse electing the relief must be either:
1.
No
longer be married to the other spouse;
2.
Legally
separated from the other spouse; or
3.
Living
apart for at least twelve (12) months from the other spouse with whom he/she
originally filed a joint tax return
Please note
that this exception would not be available to the spouse if the IRS can show
that assets were transferred between the joint filers as part of a fraudulent
scheme, or that the electing spouse had actual knowledge-of the
understatement.
D. Election of Separate Liability
1. The spouse may elect
separate liability up to two (2) years after the date the IRS begins collection
activities. The spouse may also petition the Tax Court within ninety (90) days
after the IRS mails a notice denying innocent spouse relief.
2. The IRS will not
automatically grant relief to the spouse even if all conditions are clearly
met. The spouse requesting the relief must elect this treatment by
filing IRS Form 8857, "Request for Innocent Spouse Relief". If the
spouse qualifies for relief under the innocent spouse rule, he/she is relieved
of liability of tax, interest, and penalties.
E. Equitable
Relief
Even
if "innocent spouse" or separate liability elections are not
available, the spouse will not be liable if, taking into account all the facts
and circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the
individual liable for any unpaid tax or deficiency.
F. Proposed
Language for Separation Agreements
Language
in separation agreements may assist the "innocent spouse" if a future tax liability issue arises.
Innocent
Spouse Statement. Wife/Husband has
no knowledge as to the contents of any of the
parties' federal and state income tax returns prepared by Husband/Wife or on
his/her behalf, except as to any income that Wife/Husband has
received. Wife/Husband has not been
involved in Husband's/Wife's business and is
not aware of the information provided by Husband/Wife to his/her
accountant in connection with income and expenses or other deductions related
to his/her business(es) or amounts included in their
joint federal and state income tax returns. Husband/Wife has read, and it has
been explained to him/her by his/her attorney and accountant, the definition of
"innocent souse" and related rules as provided by Section 6015 and
other related sections of the Internal Revenue Code. Husband/Wife hereby
acknowledges that Wife/Husband is an innocent spouse, as defined by the
Internal Revenue Code, with respect to the joint federal and state income tax
returns filed or to be filed.
VIII. Alimony/Maintenance/Spousal Support
A. IRC § 71 — Alimony and separate maintenance
payments.
General
rule.
Gross
income includes amounts received as alimony or separate maintenance payments.
B. Alimony or separate maintenance
payments defined.
For purposes of this
section —
(1) In general. The term "alimony
or separate maintenance
payments"
means any payment in cash if —
A.
such
payment is received by (or on behalf of) a spouse under a divorce or separation
instrument,
B.
the
divorce or separation instrument does not designate such payment as a payment
which is not includible in gross income under this section and is not allowable
as a deduction under Section 215,
C.
in
the case of an individual legally separated from his spouse under a decree of
divorce or under a separation agreement, the payee spouse and the payor spouse
are not members of the same household at the time such payment is made, and
D.
there is no obligation to make any such payment for any period after the death of the payee spouse and
there is no obligation to make any payment (in cash or property) as a
substitute for such payments after the death of the payee spouse.
(2) Divorce
or separation instrument. The term
"divorce or separation instrument" means —
A.
a
decree of divorce or separate maintenance or a written instrument incident to such a decree,
B.
a written separation agreement, or
C.
a
decree (not described in subparagraph (A)) requiring a spouse to make payments
for the support or maintenance of the other spouse.
(3) Payments to support children.
A. In
general. Payments do not constitute alimony or separate maintenance payments to
the extent the terms of the divorce or
separation instrument fix (in terms of an amount of money or a part of the
payment) such payments as a sum which is payable for the support of children of
the payor spouse.
B. Treatment
of certain reductions related to
contingencies involving child. If any
amount specified in the instrument will be reduced –
1. on the happening of a contingency
specified in the instrument relating to a child (such as attaining a specified
age, marrying, dying, leaving school, or a similar contingency), or